Standard

Posted by

Posted on

March 25, 2011

Posted under

Baseball

Comments

2 Comments

Middle Infield: A Work in Regress

A few days ago, the Seattle Mariners announced that Brendan Ryan would be their starting shortstop. Jack Wilson would move to second base. Ryan, of course, was the Cardinals shortstop last year. Wilson is a former Cards farmhand. He was traded 10 years ago for LOOGY Jason Christiansen. This was Walt Jocketty’s second worst trade as Cards GM, which says more about Jocketty’s success than Wilson’s talent.

Ryan is a very similar player to Wilson. They are both phenomenal fielders and poor hitters, though they show unexpected flashes of adequacy at the plate that can probably be explained by sample size and luck. It’s strange to see them paired up. They will combine to form a terrifying vacuum of offense in the lineup and on the field.

I want to poke fun at the Mariners middle infield. I want to call out the strange decision to let Jack Wilson and his clone get at-bats in the same game. I’m not sure I like their thinking that other infielders can play 2b even if they aren’t experienced there. It didn’t work terribly well with Chone Figgins, and Wilson hasn’t played there in the pros. But I can’t focus on any of these things in good faith because I look back at the Cardinals and they’re doing something even worse:

Skip Schumaker and Ryan Theriot.

Whenever I start to think about opening day, whenever I start to get excited that baseball is going to begin, I remember that our middle infield consists of Skip Schumaker and Ryan Theriot. They are memento mori. They remind me that I, too, will die.

Skip Schumaker is not a 2B.

To be honest, I thought the experiment was interesting. I was glad the Cardinals were willing to experiment with the defensive spectrum. I’m still glad the Cardinals are willing to experiment with the defensive spectrum. Lance Berkman in RF scares me, but it’s an exciting gamble.

But Schumaker is not a 2B. We tried. It was a worthy attempt. He’s a hard-nosed, athletic player who didn’t hit well enough to be a corner OF but played infield in college. I don’t blame the Cardinals or Tony La Russa for trying to make him a 2B. If it worked, it would have been great. But it didn’t. After two years, he’s still defensively one of the worst infielders in the majors. Total Zone numbers put him at -6 runs in the field last yar. UZR puts him at -15.4. Fielding Bible +/- had him at -9. He had 16 errors.

I’m wary about fielding statistics. Sometimes they disagree with each other. Sometimes they aren’t consistent year-to-year. But every single one agrees that Skip Schumaker is an absolutely horrible infielder. It’s a consensus, and no one who sees him play would argue against it.

Of course, if he hit well I’d be happy to ignore all those numbers. Defensive statistics aren’t as good as offensive statistics and it’s easy for a good hitter to thrive as a bad fielder, even at a position like 2B. Jeff Kent was a bad 2B and it was foolish to complain about his defensive issues. Dan Uggla is awful but his OPS is in the .800s.

Last season Schumaker had a line of .265/.328/.338. Those aren’t the numbers you want if you’re putting up with a terrible infielder. Those are the sort of numbers that are somewhat easily replaceable, even on the infield. Those are the sort of numbers that would get a guy released if he was an outfielder. And Skip Schumaker is an outfielder.

Schumaker, however, is only half the problem. The Cardinals are replacing the defensive wizardry of Brendan Ryan with the defensive shoddy workmanship of Ryan Theriot. Theriot comes to the Cardinals from the Cubs by way of the Dodgers.

Theriot hit .270/.321/.312 last year, which is to say he was a worse batter than Skip Schumaker. He’s a better fielder, though, and if he was going to be the 2B at least that would be something to feel good about. However, Theriot will be the starting SS for the Cardinals. He barely played at SS last year, but (to be fair) it wasn’t entirely his fault. He was moved off SS for 2B for Cubs rookie Starlin Castro.

Castro, however, wasn’t a terribly good SS. Total Zone has him at -12, UZR at -3. So it wasn’t like Theriot was supplanted by Ozzie Smith. Castro, however, hit well enough to stick and the Cubs never tried switching their positions. The Dodgers never even let Theriot get an inning at SS so the totality of the circumstances doesn’t suggest Theriot was an exceptional defensive SS. And when a starting position player has a .633 OPS, he should probably be exceptional.

That’s the Cardinals middle infield. Schumaker and Theriot. A slap hitting OF and 2B at 2B and SS respectively.

I want to look forward to the season. Sometimes it’s hard.

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

March 22, 2011

Posted under

Cricket

Comments

Leave a comment

This is only a Test (Part 1)

Almost exactly one week ago, I was sitting in a pub in Tamworth, England. Tamworth is a medium-sized town outside of Birmingham that is notable for exactly two reasons: an indoor ski slope that uses real snow and one of the best preserved Norman castles in the country. I was there for the castle, not the ski slope.

I wasn’t at the pub to drink. Not yet. That would come later. It was only 11:00 am and I don’t let myself drink until at least noon. But I was renting a room from the pub and it wasn’t ready yet, so I hung around in the bar, killing time until I could drop off my suitcases.

There was really nothing to do but watch the TV in the pub, which was showing a cricket match between Canada and New Zealand.

This was the first time I’d ever actually seen cricket. I’d heard about it. I’d even read about it a little, though my eyes tended to glaze over as soon as I tried to parse out the details. I knew that it was essentially the eccentric British/colonial uncle of baseball. And I love baseball, so I tried to make sense of it.

I couldn’t. It was too bizarre. The pitcher(bowler) had a running start. He was throwing at the ground, trying to bounce the ball. The batter was using some sort of paddle. There were sticks stuck in the ground. It appeared as if there was only one base, and there was always a runner on that base, and somehow runners could score more than once on a batted ball. The announcer kept talking about something called a Yorker and I couldn’t decode whether it was good or bad. The whole thing was fucking ridiculous.

Of course, that’s not cricket’s fault. I just didn’t get it. I’m sure if someone from Tamworth came to the US and watched a baseball game he’d have a hell of a time trying to figure out the infield fly rule. He might wonder why pitchers don’t always throw curveballs or why usually only 3-5 batters hit per inning. No, this was my fault. I didn’t get cricket. And that pissed me off.

I knew I would like cricket. After all, baseball is awesome. And cricket is really the only other team sport that relies so heavily on individual, instanced events. There is no clock. It all boils down to a a series of individual moments between pitchers(bowlers) and batters(batsmen) that is heavily influenced by the fielders behind(around) the pitchers(bowlers).

So I decided I needed to learn cricket. I tried wikipedia but my eyes glazed over as I tried to read the rules. But there aren’t rules. There are laws. Cricket has Laws, and that is awesome. However, reading the laws didn’t really do much to help me understand the game. I’m sure if I read the rulebook for baseball or American football I’d still be similarly confused. I needed to see everything in action. And so I came up with a plan.

I would buy a cricket video game.

This whole situation makes me feel like such a nerd. I realize that. But I honestly can’t think of a better way to learn cricket than by playing it. For various reasons–living in the US for example–actually playing cricket was out of the question.

Besides, I’ve already learned so much from video games. I played Civilization and learned that the only downside of Communism is that my pyramids would become obsolete. I spent untold amounts of time with Oregon Trail and it taught me that trying to travel to the west coast means dying of dysentery.

So when my wife and I went to Birmingham the next day, I took her on an ill-conceived quest to find a cricket video game. It turns out, cricket video games are not sold in the US. So I had to buy it while I was there. Fortunately, my wife put up with my flight of fancy. And fortunately, we found International Cricket 2010 for the PS3:

At this point, I should offer a disclaimer. If anyone wants to follow in my footsteps, you need to be careful. No one publishes cricket video games in the US. Any game you buy will likely be designed for foreign systems. The PS3 is “region free” which means it will play any game designed for any region. In this case, this is a UK game. But that’s not all! UK games run in PAL video format. US TV inputs are in NTSC format. There is one exception: HDMI is HDMI everywhere. So if you want to buy International Cricket 2010 and play it in the US, you’ll need the following:

1. A PS3 and the PS3 version of the game
2. An HDTV
3. An HDMI connection between your PS3 and your TV.

Otherwise you’ll be wasting money on a game you probably can’t play.

This week, I begin my odyssey. I’ve only stuck the game in my PS3 so far to make sure it actually plays. It does. There’s no turning back.

I will learn cricket. And I’ll detail all my attempts right here.

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

March 21, 2011

Posted under

Uncategorized

Comments

1 Comment

A Blog…Take 3

So I’m not very good at blogging.

I’ve tried it a couple times already and I tend to stop posting. Don’t worry. I have excuses. The first time, I was planning on starting a blog about law school. I was advised not to do that by some of my professors. So I didn’t. The second time, on this very blog, a variety of things happened. I started writing a novel. I got a summer job that took up a ton of time. I wrote two detailed fictional posts about Cardinals pitchers getting injured. And then both of those pitchers actually got seriously injured. That wasn’t very encouraging.

But that’s all in the past. I’m going to do this again. I’m going to do it right. Baseball season is about to start. The Cardinals are shaping up to be an amusing trainwreck. Albert Pujols is entering his contract year, Lance Berkman is starting in the outfield, and the team is now home to both Ryan Theriot and Nick Punto. The only thing on the horizon for me is the bar exam and I’m going to need a break from studying. Hopefully blogging will fill that need. Who knows? Maybe this time I can make it work.

Let’s try this one more time.

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

August 2, 2010

Posted under

Baseball

Comments

Leave a comment

Jake Westbrook and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Trade

It’s been a while since I posted anything.  There are a few reasons for that.  First of all, I happened to write two lengthy fictional posts about starting pitchers for the Cardinals which ended with those two pitchers getting injured.  And then those two pitchers were actually injured.  And they are still injured.  I’m not a superstitious person, but this gave me some pause.  Second, I started working on a novel and that took precedence over blogging about the Cardinals.  Third, the Cardinals just got depressing.  Even though they’re still in the playoff hunt (and thus a lot less depressing than some other teams) they’ve been playing with a sort of listlessness that makes watching the games infuriating.  I started paying attention the MLB at-bat feed rather than the actual game because there’s only so many times you can see someone swing at a Bud Norris “pitch” and miss.

But now Kyle Lohse is back to pitching again.  I’m done with my novel.  The Cardinals are playing better baseball, though they still seem befuddled by certain pitchers.  It’s time I start this back up again.  And what a time to start up, because the Cardinals have made an excruciatingly bad trade.

I ask you this: is there anyone out there that really, truly thinks it was a good idea to trade Ryan Ludwick for Jake Westbrook?

Bernie Miklasz noted the following in his article discussing the trade:

Since the start of the 2008 season, Ludwick ranks second in RBIs, third in homers and fourth in slugging percentage among NL outfielders.
Let’s just let that sink in.  We traded this guy for Jake Westbrook.  Second in RBIS basically means nothing, Ludwick spent a lot of that time hitting behind Albert Pujols, who is on base all the time.  But third in HR?  Fourth in SLG?  An argument could be made that Ludwick is one of the top 10 outfielders in the NL.  And we traded him for Jake Westbrook.

A few Jake Westbrook facts:

Jake Westbrook has a 4.65 ERA.  This is not good. In offense-heavy years, this is hovering around average.  In 2010, this is definitely below average.  But of course, ERA doesn’t really show you the whole picture so…

Jake Westbrook has a 4.67 FIP and 4.41 xFIP.  Both of these stats take a varying amount of luck out of ERA and calculate it based on strikeout/walk/flyball/HR percentage.  While they don’t tell you how many runs a pitcher has given up over an average of 9 innings, they do a great job of telling you how many runs he will tend to give up over an average of 9 innings.  It also tells you that his ERA isn’t really predicated that much on luck or stadium effects.  He really is below average.

Jake Westbrook won’t pitch 9 innings anyway.  The few people who see a silver lining in this trade frame Westbrook as an innings-eater, a guy who the Cards needed because Garcia is going to pitch far more than he ever has, Carpenter is fragile, and the rotation needs stability.  But Westbrook is coming off Tommy John surgery, didn’t pitch last year, and probably has an innings ceiling just like Garcia.  He’s averaged only six innings a game.

Jake Westbrook isn’t signed for next year and won’t even be a Type B free agent.  In the last updated Elias rankings estimations by mlbtraderumors.com, Westbrook was nestled somewhere between Vin Mazzaro and Derek Holland.  He was far short of luminaries such as Brian Bannister and Josh Outman, who has not even pitched this year.  He gives the Cardinals nothing past this season.  Ryan Ludwick was under team control for 2011.

Basically the Cardinals traded an above average OF with one more year of arbitration for a 2 month rental of a below average starting pitcher.

In a vacuum I have no problem with either acquiring Westbrook or trading Ludwick.  Westbrook isn’t the prototypical Duncan project.  He already throws a sinker.  But he’s better than Jeff Suppan.  Ludwick was getting pushed out by Jay and was going to be expensive next year.  I get that.  But why this trade?  Certainly they could have gotten more value for Ludwick who, again, is third in the NL in home runs among OF over the last 2+ years.   Maybe they could have swung the prospects for a better pitcher.  Or a middle infielder.

And even more certainly, they could have acquired the obviously below-average and overpaid Westbrook without trading one of their best hitters.

The way the trade went down even proves the latter point.  The Cardinals sent Ludwick to San Diego, who sent Cory Kluber to the Indians.  Kluber is a 24 year old righthanded pitcher who is, like any decent 24 year old pitcher should, dominating AA batters.  He’s doing well but he’s old (24) for his level and he doesn’t have a great track record.  His career minor league ERA is 4.29 and his career minor league FIP is 4.00.  And he’s always been a little old for his league.

Did the Cards have anyone like this?  Of course they did.  Hell, PJ Walters is pretty close to Cory Kluber.  He’s a year older, but he’s followed almost exactly the same career path, succeeding in the minors as a slightly older prospect.  Walters’s career ERA/FIP are even better than Klubers  (3.66/3.75) in more innings.

Charles Fick in AA/AAA is the same age as Klubel and, again, has a similar career.  Who the hell is Charles Fick?  Yeah, I don’t really know either.  But that’s the point. Cleveland essentially took a nobody for Westbrook. A PJ Walters or Charles Fick. Why did we have to trade Ludwick?  We didn’t.  It was a stupid trade.  We could have and should have gotten Westbrook for a song.  Instead, we traded our starting RF.

That’s not a move that a contending team makes.
Standard

Posted by

Posted on

June 8, 2010

Posted under

Baseball

Comments

Leave a comment

A Good Choice, A Good Day

In the 2007 MLB Amateur Draft, the St. Louis Cardinals took Pete Kozma, a high school shortstop out of Oklahoma as the 18th overall pick.  This was an underwhelming pick by itself.  Kozma didn’t particularly distinguish himself in any fashion, and the best thing the scouting reports had to say about him was how hard he played.

Comparisons to David Eckstein and Aaron Miles immediately sprung to mind, which wasn’t exactly fair.  Kozma isn’t built in their mold.  He started off with far more talent than them, and just because some scouts decided to call him gritty (likely because he’s thin and white and plays shortstop) didn’t mean he was an undersized utilityman-in-waiting. Nevertheless, he wasn’t the kind of impact player you look to draft in the first round.

2007 was a top-heavy draft, a lot of talent was gone by pick 18, and in retrospect I think a lot of fans would have forgiven the Kozma pick.  I say they would have forgiven the pick, and not that they have, because Rick Porcello was on the board.

Porcello was arguably the second best arm in the draft after #1 pick David Price.  He wasn’t some diamond in the rough.  Everyone knew how good he was.  The Cardinals didn’t pick him because he was looking to receive one of the largest contracts in MLB draft history.  In fact, the only reason he fell to #18 was because of his contract demands.  Otherwise, he would have easily been taken in the first few picks.

To be fair to the Cardinals, several more teams, including large market clubs like the Dodgers and Phillies, passed on Porcello before he went to the Tigers at #27.   And of course several passed on Porcello before them.  Of course, Cardinal fans don’t remember that when they look at Pete Kozma’s .245/.320/.353 line in the minors and compare it to the fact that Porcello is contributing in the majors at age 21.   Given how much money teams shell out to the likes of Kyle Lohse, Brad Penny, and Ryan Franklin (to name a few overpaid pitchers), even Porcello’s ludicrous $11.1 million looks reasonable.

Cards fans still harp on that draft, and they’re right to do so.  So are the fans of at least a dozen other teams, who would undoubtedly go back and pay Porcello $11.1 million to pitch for their club right now. Fortunately, unlike some of those teams, the Cardinals have learned their lesson.

In the next two drafts (2008 and 2009) the Cards drafted the best player available.  First it was Brett Wallace, an already-polished college power hitter who would later help them snag Matt Holliday.  Then it was Shelby Miller, a high school RHP who didn’t have the lofty demands of Rick Porcello, but who confronted the Cardinals with a similar conundrum.  Miller, like Porcello, would have gone earlier in the draft if not for signability concerns.  He fell to the Cardinals, they snatched him up, and they paid his price tag.  Now he’s putting up better peripherals in single-A than Porcello did at the same age, Miller’s comically inflated ERA be damned.

Today, the Cardinals were faced with the Porcello problem once more.  When they went on the clock with the 25th pick, a top 10 talent was still on the board.  Zack Cox was, by some estimations, the best college position player in the draft.  Most mock drafts had him going at #7 to the Mets. But, like Porcello before him, Cox scared off teams with his contract demands (which will likely be even larger than what Porcello asked for) and was on the board at 25.

This time the Cardinals didn’t play it safe.  They didn’t pick Pete Kozma.  They chose the best player available at #25, arguably the best player available well before that.  I’ll be honest, I was shocked when the pick was announced.  But maybe I’ve underestimated the front office.  Maybe I should have learned from Wallace and Miller that they really do know what they’re doing now.  That we’re not going to see another Pete Kozma at #18.

2007 was a mistake.  Today I learned that, unlike some other teams, the Cardinals learn from their mistakes.

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

May 17, 2010

Posted under

Baseball

Comments

Leave a comment

Matt Holliday, the Clean-Up Spot, and other Magicks

The Cardinals are no longer in first place in the NL Central.

This has caused a lot of panic among Cardinal fans, and some of that panic is justified.  This was a team that was supposed to walk away with the division.   So what’s wrong?

Right now, Matt Holliday is batting .170/.264/.191 with runners in scoring position. Over his career, he’s hit .293/.388/.487 with RISP.  In Cardinal wins, Matt Holliday bats .352/.425/.549.  In losses, he’s batting .242/.275/.364.  So clearly the problem is Matt Holliday, right?  He’s just not hitting like he used to with RISP.  So what happened?

The stats show that prior to this season, Matt Holliday was obviously a “clutch player”.  During the offseason, he was walking to his car when an old beggar woman asked him for a few cents worth of change, so that she might buy herself a sandwich at the local eatery.  She had been on the street for days and was starving, and Matt Holliday was the richest man she had encountered in all that time.  Despite the fact he had just signed the largest contract in St. Louis Cardinals history, he refused to help her out and accidentally pushed her to the ground as he passed her by.

Little did he know that the old woman was actually a powerful witch.  That night, she sacrificed two pidgeons, spoke aloud from the Neconomicon, and spread their entrails in a circle around a 1999 Matt Holliday Bowman rookie card.  She set the ritual ablaze and since then, Holliday has been unable to make solid contact with pitches when, and only when, there are men on second or third base.

The Cardinals’ disgraceful fall from first place spurred Tony La Russa to investigate this curse.  La Russa is a wily manager, who’s been around a long time, and he realized that if he could make sure that if Matt Holliday gets fewer at-bats with men on base then he will hit better overall.  The Cardinals’ leadoff hitters and #2 hitters have been terrible this year, so the clever Tony La Russa figures that if he bats Matt Holliday third, then the curse will have less of a negative effect on the team.  He will bat with no one on base more often and therefore hit better.   He will get on base and Albert Pujols, who has never shoved a homeless witch to the ground in his life, will successfully drive him in.

I take issue with this decision.  First off, we have no way of knowing the accuracy of the witch’s curse.  Matt Holliday was the target, but what if the curse actually attached to the #4 spot in the lineup?  Hexes are notoriously finicky, and since Holliday has been batting there all season, the effects may have transferred over.  Second, we don’t know whether the witch is capable of inflicting a second curse upon Holliday.  If she’s still angry about their encounter on the street, and she has access to at least one gecko, she’ll be able to sap him of all of his composure.  Clean-up hitters don’t need much composure, but can you imagine a #3 hitter with no composure?  It will be awful!  It would be even worse than a leadoff hitter without scrap or a #8 hitter without heart!  Third, shuffling the lineup ignores the real problem: the witch.  The witch isn’t going to be appeased by giving Albert Pujols fewer at-bats over the courtse of the season.  If she’s a Cardinals fan, that should just make her more mad.

No, if La Russa no longer believes that Holliday can hit with men on base, he needs to track down the witch and give her a sandwich.  That will solve the problem.  Holliday will have his clutch back, and we can go back to winning baseball games.

If you can’t find the witch, just bat Holliday second, in front of Pujols.  That way even if the cleanup spot has been tainted by the curse, it won’t affect one of our best two hitters.  Further, the witch could go ahead and sap Holliday of all of his composure and we’d be fine.  Because all you need as a #2 hitter is grit, and the spell to deplete grit is far beyond the capabilities of any American witch.

Wait, you think I’m talking crazy?  Well, I figured that some of my readers might be those who think that Matt Holliday and Albert Pujols should be switched because one of them can hit with RISP and the others can’t based on a month and a half sample size.  And I was just trying to speak to them in a language they might understand: fucking crazy talk.

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

May 12, 2010

Posted under

Baseball

Comments

Leave a comment

The Adventures of the Crimson Ace: Episode I

In a world where justice is high and tight, where death dances on the outside corner, one man dares to walk the thin line between balls and strikes.  By day, he is Brad Penny, well-heeled major league baseball pitcher and man-about-town.  By night, he dons a red cowl and becomes…  THE CRIMSON ACE.

Today, The Crimson Ace meets his most fearsome foe to date, the dreaded DOMESTIC DISTURBER, a villain of little chivalry but great cruelty.  What will happen when these two powerhouses clash?  Find out in “The Adventures of the Crimson Ace: Episode I”.

Continue reading →

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

May 9, 2010

Posted under

Baseball

Comments

Leave a comment

Everybody Hates Shelby

In 2009, the Cardinals selected Shelby Miller as the 19th pick in June’s amateur draft.  He was considered one of the top high school arms, if not the best high school pitcher available in the draft, and likely only fell to the Cardinals due to signability concerns.  Fortunately, the Cards managed to work out an agreement with him at the last minute. But everyone reading this probably knew all that.  I’m here to tell you some other things about Shelby Miller, that you probably didn’t know.

Shelby Miller is a master of ping pong, honing his skills for years as a child in his mother’s basement.

If you were to look at Miller’s stats in Quad A, you might be concerned about him.  Even in small sample sizes, pitchers with stuff like Miller shouldn’t have numbers that look like this: 0-2, 5.32 ERA, 1.56 WHIP…  Those are Lohse-ian, not what you look for in a guy who was given a huge signing bonus.  Sure, he’s young, but he’s facing young guys, too.  So what’s wrong with him?

When Shelby Miller was in high school, he was in a serious accident after a deck collapsed at a party he was attending, killing eight people.  While there were 23 others on the deck, he always blamed himself for the accident.

The truth is, there’s no reason to panic.  Look beyond the statistics that get cited on ESPN, and you’ll see that he’s actually off to a fantastic start.  In 23.2 innings, he’s struck out 41 batters.  That’s what those of us who like to get excited about things call that “really fucking awesome”.  That’s the kind of K rate Tim Linecum was putting up in the minors a few years ago.  He’s only walked 9 batters, and given up two home runs.  His FIP, which is a statistic that predicts what ERA should be, rather than what it is, hovers around 2.30 according to Minor League Splits.

Shortly after receiving his signing bonus, Shelby Miller purchased a brand new home for his mother.  However, on the day he planned to surprise her with the house, the building caught on fire and his mother broke her ankle.  Miller ended up being arrested after the police arrived because of a passing resemblance to a local drug dealer.

So if he’s actually dominating A-ball, why are Miller’s ERA and WHIP so bad?  You see, Shelby Miller has been very unlucky.  Monumentally unlucky.  His BAbip, again according to Minor League Splits, is .464.  BAbip represents the opposing batter’s batting average on balls in play.  The average BAbip, quite conveniently, is somewhere around .300.  Everything above or below that is a combination of luck and defense.  Miller’s .464 is probably more stunning than his K rate. Almost half of every ball that is hit into play falls for a base hit.

In high school, Shelby Miller dominated his opponents, and put up the following numbers, which led to his massive signing bonus.  4 complete games, 8 wins, 15 Earned runs, a 1.60 ERA, .230 Batting Average allowed, .420 OPS allowed.

In short, there is nothing to worry about with Shelby Miller.  His “struggles”, if you can even call then that, are just the product of unbelievably bad luck.  Despite what you might hear, he actually is dominating his level, and doing so at a young age.

The fried chicken restaurant where Shelby Miller used to work was destroyed by a meteor that also killed a famous local reporter.

If you can’t tell, I’m pretty disgusted with the major league Cardinals right now, so I’ve chosen to focus on a bright spot in the future, and reassure everyone that even if the team is infuriating right now, our top prospect isn’t as awful as his front page numbers might suggest.

Unless he is the unluckiest man alive, Shelby “Hurley” Miller should be just fine.  Just don’t let him get on any planes bound to Australia.

None of the Shelby Miller facts in italics were true.  If you haven’t, you should probably watch LOST.  It’s even better on DVD.

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

May 6, 2010

Posted under

Baseball

Comments

6 Comments

Lohse-erella

Once upon a time there was a pitcher named Kyle Lohse.  Kyle lived in the Flyover Kingdom with his overbearing father Tony and his four wicked, vain stepbrothers, Chris, Adam, Jaime, and Brad.  Each one of his stepbrothers was beloved by the townsfolk and showered with adoration.  They spoke of the great riches and medals Chris had won, and those that they believed had been stolen from him by the feared giant near the sea, Baron Lincecum.  They told tales of Adam’s fearsome curveball, which was said to turn great warriors into stone statues.  Jaime was praised for his youth and his good fortune.  Brad, unlike the others, was a portly man of little talent, but he had slept with Alyssa Milano, so he was revered without question.

Continue reading →

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

May 5, 2010

Posted under

Baseball

Comments

2 Comments

Tyler Greene: Leadoff Hitter

It’s been said, by people far smarter than me, that the day-in and day-out batting orders aren’t that important.  Specifically, this was noted in the excellent book The Book by Tom Tango and company, which I feel is underrated or at least under-discussed mostly because of its terribly generic name.  I don’t have my copy of The Book with me right now, probably because its in storage, but if I recall correctly the very best lineup, used in every game, only nets about 5-6 wins over a season compared to the very worst lineup.  No one uses the very worst lineup, except maybe the Royals, and the value in each individual game is fairly marginal.

Nevertheless, when I see someone like Tyler Greene batting leadoff, I sit up and take notice.  Some Tyler Greene facts:

  • Career .200 hitter in the majors
  • Career .264 OBP in the majors
  • Career .335 OBP in the minors
  • Only decent offensive year at any level inflated by a .350 BAbip
  • Named his son Brayden

Brayden?  Christ, that kid is stuck with the douchiness of the name “Braden” multiplied the uncalled-for need of every parent these days to stick a “y” where it doesn’t belong.  No, I don’t want to meet your baby daughter Tyffyny.  I already know I won’t lyke her.

Inexcusable parenting decisions aside, those aren’t the stats you want to see from a leadoff hitter.  Those aren’t the stats you want to see from any hitter in the lineup, but assuming you absolutely must play Tyler Greene for some reason, you’d ideally like him getting as few PAs as possible.  So why was Tyler Greene setting the table for Ryan Ludwick and Albert Pujols?  I’m going to give Tony La Russa the benefit of that doubt that he hadn’t placed a bet on the Phillies before the game, so I’m pretty sure the answer is because he’s right handed.

In fact, the entire lineup was right handed last night, which also meant that four out of nine of the batters in the lineup were batting somewhere around .200.  That is A Bad Thing and against a good pitcher like Hamels there’s really no doubt in my mind why the Cardinals only scored one run last night.  You can’t play with half a lineup and expect to do some damage.  Mather and Greene are AAAA players and Brendan Ryan is the kind of guy you accept in the lineup only when there aren’t two other guys hitting even worse.

I realize that in Tony La Russa’s mind, sending a lefhanded batter to face a lefthanded pitcher is like trying to beat “rock” with “scissors”.  In years past, he’s been able to get a lot out of marginal guys by playing the percentages.  But Greene and Mather don’t look like marginal guys.  There’s no reason to be running them out there instead of Colby Rasmus or Skip Schumaker.  Rasmus, especially.  It’s one thing when you’re platooning a Schumaker, a vet with several years under his belt and a .522 OPS against lefties.  But Rasmus is young, has success in the minors against southpaws (.826 OPS compared to .860 against righties), and is the future of the team.

Sure, Rasmus has struggled in (limited) playing time against lefthanded pitchers so far in the majors.  But he’s not going to learn to hit them sitting on the bench.  I’m having flashbacks to 1999 and a young J.D. Drew losing playing time in CF to the corpse of Shawon Dunston.  That’s not something I want to see repeated this season.  If we’re going to have a black hole in the lineup, let it be the slick fielding young player who is still developing, not Joe Mather.

And if Tyler Greene absolutely must be in the lineup, please don’t bat him leadoff.